Hey all, very belated happy new year to you all (except maybe Candy, who is the subject of this post).
Candy has had several run-ins with the police ever since coming to NOLA.
Most recently she was harassing some teenagers who called the Gretna, LA cops on her over the harassment she gave them for eating the wrong color cake. Now Candy was arrested by the Gretna PD for criminal mischief.
Like I said on YouTube, Candy’s status of being a homeless female has likely given her harassment and loitering a lot of deference from police departments everywhere she goes, but that finally came to a brief end and she is having to face some small measure of justice for her bullying and bad behavior in public.
The thing with Candy getting triggered by and losing her shit over red velvet cake has turned into a meme.
Candy is also reading the comments here again (she was ignoring us for a while). She’s unhappy that people want to get copies of her mugshot (Candy, it’s public record. Be happy that Jefferson Parish charges $10 for those mugshots otherwise it’d already be plastered all over the interwebs!)
She’s also blaming me for a cake-related interaction with her on Twitter and one of Candy’s Twitter friends is trying to tag Donald Trump to help her with the cake-related harassment: https://twitter.com/paula81958606/status/1767438040673538192
Candy, on her Twitter, linked to this lunatic app-generated synth-voiced Satanic conspiracy theory animation about doctors conducting human sacrifices to the Devil in exchange for money.
This animation really needs a “South Park exposes Scientology”-style caption flashing at the bottom of the screen, “This is what Candy Grandpre actually believes!”
Candy is being “forced orgasmed”. I think this is just another variation of her “organ squeezing” attacks.
Candy’s being zapped by the Orgasmorator!
Candy needs to learn that when she posts pictures online on a public account, people will use them as they see fit.
It’s not a paranoid program against her, it’s a fact of the digital age.
I have previously received money for “fixing” damaged pictures, but don’t get money for anything I do online, and never have. I am just creative enough when I see an opportunity I take it.
Unfortunately, this is late, as Valentine’s Day was last month.
A small portion of this would make a killer um….sphincter.
Happy Belated Valentine’s Day!
Yeah, you don’t pay for services, you don’t get the benefit and finished job those services.
People don’t cooperate when you have a contract and YOU don’t fulfill your end.
It’s not a game, it’s real life.
Bryan hasn’t paid his lawyer, lawyer won’t help him anymore, Bryan calls it “hyper game theory”.
(To make things clear, I think everyone involved here are bad actors and they kinda deserve each other)
Yeah, her ideas about trespassing are weird. It’s what suits her, against what spoils her “spot.”
When she was trespassed off the alley way, she made a big deal about the woman, who was working later than usual and did not know she slept there, was not the owner of the buildings. First Candy could not possible know who owned the building, I doubt she took the time to do a search about that, too. But if that woman was the manager, or had word from the manager of that building, they would be given the same weight as though they owned the building. So she was wrong. But if you just think about all the places that she has been banned from, I doubt many have had the order to trespass was ever by the actual owner.
The “criminal mischief” charge will not stand up, though. Unless she had been caught peeing in the bushes. Which would have been really sweet to see, since she has been peeing all over and claiming that as a “right.” As a choice between the two possible charges, I would have chosen the trespassing, although some sources say “ENTER INTO” somewhere, and she had not entered.
Her assumption that someone called and lied about being the owner is just crazy talk. How would they know the address of the house? It is much more likely, and more logical that the cops saw her for several days, and she seemed to be claiming that porch. And the day before someone walking their dog almost caught her peeing somewhere, and that is much more likely as the source of a call, should any have been made. If I had seen someone lurking around a vacant, for sale home in my neighborhood, I would probably call the cops to come visit, too.
As someone who first thought Candy was “retarded” (a word that was used when I was growing up) a lawyer probably dumbed down and appeased the crazy retarded lady. And she will likely get off all charges, possibly through “diminished capacity” or something like it. And I do not trust her retelling what a lawyer said very far, given she has weird lapses of logic, like thinking you can sleep at and pee on a vacant property and it’s okay and not trespassing.
She wrote her version of the whole affair. It is not really going to be something to be used exactly as written, if they can read it at all. I would not be surprised if someone types it up, editting it as they go. It is the whole story of what a victim she has been her entire life, and the bully cops, she doesn’t call them slurs, at least I don’t think she did, but it is good evidence she is not the type of person who has a college degree.
Candy allegedly has a lawyer telling her she isn’t guilty of trespassing. I reviewed the relevant law and I don’t see how anyone could come to that conclusion.
Criminal mischief, kinda depends on exactly what she did. But trespassing for sure she did.
She is also claiming that someone called Gretna PD pretending to be the property owner to have her removed, and that if the actual property owner doesn’t ask for her to be removed, she is allowed to be there.
I certainly do believe someone could have done that but it’s not true that the police have to hear from the property owner to have someone removed for trespassing in Louisiana.
I would note that this is different than the laws in Texas; Texas requires that a property owner (or someone with authority to do so, such as someone leasing property i.e. renting a house) ask someone to leave first before the police can get involved or there has to be visible “No Trespassing” signs. Candy and/or whoever Candy is talking to seems to be giving her (incorrect) advice based on that notion.
What is this woman doing that is either “criminal” or “mischief?”
Wearing red? Anyone can buy and wear any color they want. It means nothing. You are just paranoid and delusional. You’ve had doctors diagnose that, Candy.
Sitting quietly in the library with a laptop (or a book)?
Well, what are YOU doing? Taking and posting pictures without her permission? Does the library know you do that? It is invading her privacy.
And before you go all “sex-traffickers take MY picture and sell them online,” I ask you prove that. The one picture is from Bloomington, from someone who wanted to know who you were. Not showing your face. Not being sold. And not sexual in anyway.
And Candy needs to pay $130. She said it was for bond, but they let her out, so maybe that was her fine? Since she can spend her entire SSDI check in less than a week, that is going to hurt.
Oh, there will be butthurt and craziness. They disrespected her baptism certificate so they will surely burn in hell. Which she told them.
Knowing her tendency toward both grandiosity and histrionics, what actually happened will never be known without a report from the police and jail staff. Which is too bad.
Candy thinks they tried to break her phone so she could not film their abuse. She must not realize that cops film everything. The reason they grabbed her was because she was not doing what she was told to do. That is resisting.
Candy was even told “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” while being booked. Give that officer a hand..
Candy is a 40 year old grown ass woman who didn’t realize “vacant” properties were still “private property.” And that staying on someone’s private propty, no matter what the building might be, is still trespassing, which is a crime.
Or that a police officer’s job is to remove criminals from lawful society.
But she has a college degree.
I looked up the Jefferson parish charges 10 bucks for her mugshot I want to try to get. Bodycam
I was going to do it myself but they want to record my full name and I’m guessing the fact I requested her records would be a record someone else could request so yeah I’m not requesting her mugshot. If you do feel inclined to please share !